Spring, 2002 - Measured Progress Report
This report contains baseline and progress data for the goals and objectives in the District Improvement Plan
Based on the profile of the district that emerged from the analysis of strengths and weaknesses, benchmark standards were identified. Three types were used and are followed by the specific benchmarks.
(a) Comparisons to statewide data;
(b) Comparisons to a select group of communities that form a cohort group for the district (Chariho, Tiverton, North Smithfield, Scituate); and
(c) Internal comparisons, using our own baseline data.
Student academic performance to be determined by:
Cohort progress over time - the gains made by the same students as they move through grades;
|
class |
year |
gr |
Basic
math |
Math
concepts |
Problem
solving |
State
writing |
State
local |
|
|
2001 |
1997 |
8 |
70 |
30 |
36 |
37 |
local |
|
|
2001 |
1997 |
8 |
56 |
18 |
19 |
34 |
state |
|
|
2001 |
1999 |
10 |
62 |
30 |
19 |
50 |
local |
|
|
2001 |
1999 |
10 |
43 |
24 |
17 |
39 |
state |
|
|
class |
year |
gr |
Basic math |
Math concepts |
Problem solving |
Basic reading |
Reading analysis |
Writing effective-ness |
Writing convent-ions |
State
local |
|
2002 |
1998 |
8 |
66 |
42 |
32 |
66 |
44 |
80 |
77 |
local |
|
2002 |
1998 |
8 |
51 |
26 |
20 |
57 |
38 |
83 |
77 |
state |
|
2002 |
2000 |
10 |
61 |
36 |
20 |
53 |
52 |
34 |
72 |
local |
|
2002 |
2000 |
10 |
47 |
24 |
19 |
43 |
40 |
28 |
72 |
state |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 |
1999 |
8 |
71 |
33 |
43 |
58 |
25 |
48 |
53 |
local |
|
2003 |
1999 |
8 |
62 |
21 |
30 |
52 |
23 |
44 |
54 |
state |
|
2003 |
2001 |
10 |
55 |
39 |
28 |
51 |
41 |
25 |
71 |
local |
|
2003 |
2001 |
10 |
40 |
22 |
19 |
39 |
33 |
26 |
57 |
state |
EWG scores with respect to statewide scores, seeking to widen the gap where scores are closest to statewide scores;
|
Differences between EWG and RI scores for New Standards assessments |
|
class |
year |
gr |
basic
math |
math
concepts |
math
problems |
reading
basic |
reading
analysis |
writing
effect |
writing
conv |
|
2006 |
1998 |
4 |
8 |
2 |
0 |
7 |
3 |
-1 |
-7 |
|
2007 |
1999 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
6 |
4 |
11 |
3 |
|
2008 |
2000 |
4 |
-7 |
-2 |
-3 |
4 |
6 |
0 |
-6 |
|
2009 |
2001 |
4 |
8 |
1 |
-4 |
8 |
3 |
5 |
7 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2001 |
1997 |
8 |
14 |
12 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
2002 |
1998 |
8 |
15 |
16 |
12 |
9 |
6 |
-3 |
0 |
|
2003 |
1999 |
8 |
9 |
12 |
13 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
-1 |
|
2004 |
2000 |
8 |
12 |
9 |
17 |
-3 |
-9 |
14 |
-4 |
|
2005 |
2001 |
8 |
17 |
12 |
14 |
12 |
5 |
1 |
0 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1999 |
1997 |
10 |
16 |
19 |
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
2000 |
1998 |
10 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
2001 |
1999 |
10 |
19 |
6 |
2 |
9 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
|
2002 |
2000 |
10 |
14 |
12 |
1 |
10 |
12 |
6 |
0 |
|
2003 |
2001 |
10 |
15 |
17 |
9 |
12 |
8 |
-1 |
14 |
Relative scores of male and female students; and
Gap between female and male scores in the following test areas
| |
|
Math
Skills |
Math
Prob. Solv. |
Reading
Analysis |
Writing
Effectiveness |
|
Gr 4 |
1999 |
2 |
10 |
4 |
12 |
|
Gr 8 |
1999 |
2 |
2 |
17 |
22 |
|
Gr 10 |
1999 |
13 |
7 |
12 |
14 |
|
Gr 4 |
2001 |
5 |
9 |
29 |
20 |
|
Gr 8 |
2001 |
5 |
-2 |
5 |
9 |
|
Gr 10 |
2001 |
3 |
-1 |
22 |
24 |
EWG scores with respect to our cohort group.
|
EWG to Comparison Communities, 1999 Assessments |
| |
|
Gap |
Mean |
EWG |
Scituate |
Tiverton |
Chariho |
N. Smith |
|
4 |
Basic Read |
1 |
89 |
90 |
84 |
92 |
91 |
89 |
| |
Anal & Int |
-4 |
76 |
72 |
73 |
79 |
77 |
78 |
| |
Write Eff |
-2 |
56 |
54 |
60 |
60 |
68 |
39 |
| |
Write Conv |
-7 |
58 |
51 |
53 |
62 |
66 |
60 |
| |
Math Skill |
-9 |
73 |
64 |
76 |
77 |
75 |
73 |
| |
Math Conc |
-8 |
41 |
33 |
44 |
39 |
45 |
45 |
| |
Math Prob |
-5 |
32 |
27 |
46 |
31 |
30 |
27 |
|
8 |
Basic Read |
-4 |
62 |
58 |
87 |
55 |
53 |
57 |
| |
Anal & Int |
-4 |
29 |
25 |
55 |
19 |
20 |
24 |
| |
Write Eff |
-3 |
51 |
48 |
83 |
43 |
32 |
51 |
| |
Write Conv |
-6 |
60 |
54 |
77 |
61 |
42 |
67 |
| |
Math Skill |
0 |
71 |
71 |
80 |
68 |
64 |
71 |
| |
Math Conc |
3 |
30 |
33 |
35 |
28 |
26 |
27 |
| |
Math Prob |
3 |
40 |
43 |
49 |
38 |
34 |
34 |
|
10 |
Basic Read |
6 |
36 |
42 |
46 |
45 |
20 |
27 |
| |
Anal & Int |
1 |
20 |
21 |
30 |
23 |
8 |
20 |
| |
Write Eff |
-1 |
17 |
16 |
29 |
9 |
12 |
21 |
| |
Write Conv |
0 |
75 |
75 |
92 |
77 |
61 |
70 |
| |
Math Skill |
13 |
49 |
62 |
51 |
39 |
43 |
52 |
| |
Math Conc |
2 |
28 |
30 |
31 |
24 |
20 |
37 |
| |
Math Prob |
-2 |
21 |
19 |
26 |
22 |
11 |
27 |
|
EWG to Comparison Communities, 2000 Assessments |
| |
2000 |
Gap |
Mean |
EWG |
Scituate |
Tiverton |
Chariho |
N. Smith |
|
4 |
Basic Read |
-3 |
90 |
87 |
92 |
88 |
90 |
92 |
| |
Anal & Int |
-2 |
76 |
74 |
80 |
75 |
73 |
78 |
| |
Write Eff |
-11 |
67 |
56 |
78 |
67 |
71 |
63 |
| |
Write Conv |
-14 |
42 |
28 |
57 |
55 |
40 |
31 |
| |
Math Skill |
-20 |
75 |
55 |
84 |
79 |
81 |
76 |
| |
Math Conc |
-13 |
39 |
26 |
45 |
36 |
52 |
35 |
| |
Math Prob |
-12 |
30 |
18 |
39 |
34 |
29 |
28 |
| |
NET |
-74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
Basic Read |
-12 |
65 |
53 |
81 |
60 |
64 |
68 |
| |
Anal & Int |
-18 |
34 |
16 |
50 |
32 |
36 |
36 |
| |
Write Eff |
-1 |
71 |
70 |
79 |
86 |
65 |
56 |
| |
Write Conv |
-4 |
62 |
58 |
58 |
74 |
61 |
60 |
| |
Math Skill |
-2 |
75 |
73 |
82 |
78 |
72 |
68 |
| |
Math Conc |
-1 |
30 |
29 |
27 |
36 |
37 |
22 |
| |
Math Prob |
4 |
42 |
46 |
45 |
41 |
45 |
34 |
| |
NET |
-35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
Basic Read |
-1 |
54 |
53 |
58 |
39 |
62 |
58 |
| |
Anal & Int |
2 |
50 |
52 |
53 |
36 |
55 |
53 |
| |
Write Eff |
-3 |
37 |
34 |
46 |
34 |
28 |
41 |
| |
Write Conv |
-7 |
79 |
72 |
85 |
79 |
78 |
82 |
| |
Math Skill |
4 |
57 |
61 |
59 |
44 |
54 |
67 |
| |
Math Conc |
-2 |
28 |
26 |
32 |
22 |
24 |
35 |
| |
Math Prob |
-3 |
23 |
20 |
27 |
18 |
25 |
24 |
|
EWG to Comparison Communities, 2001 Assessments |
| |
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
Basic Read |
-6 |
85 |
79 |
87 |
78 |
85 |
94 |
| |
Anal & Int |
-11 |
72 |
61 |
78 |
60 |
78 |
82 |
| |
Write Eff |
-6 |
72 |
66 |
76 |
67 |
75 |
75 |
| |
Write Conv |
-7 |
68 |
61 |
75 |
64 |
67 |
71 |
| |
Math Skill |
-7 |
75 |
68 |
79 |
75 |
78 |
77 |
| |
Math Conc |
-13 |
47 |
34 |
62 |
43 |
60 |
37 |
| |
Math Prob |
-13 |
31 |
18 |
43 |
24 |
43 |
29 |
| |
NET |
-63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
Basic Read |
-2 |
63 |
61 |
70 |
60 |
69 |
56 |
| |
Anal & Int |
-3 |
33 |
30 |
41 |
25 |
39 |
28 |
| |
Write Eff |
-12 |
63 |
51 |
82 |
66 |
67 |
47 |
| |
Write Conv |
-7 |
52 |
45 |
64 |
52 |
54 |
46 |
| |
Math Skill |
0 |
58 |
58 |
70 |
48 |
64 |
49 |
| |
Math Conc |
3 |
28 |
31 |
41 |
21 |
30 |
16 |
| |
Math Prob |
2 |
36 |
38 |
56 |
24 |
38 |
25 |
| |
NET |
-18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
Basic Read |
-1 |
52 |
51 |
67 |
49 |
41 |
50 |
| |
Anal & Int |
-2 |
43 |
41 |
55 |
42 |
34 |
45 |
| |
Write Eff |
-6 |
31 |
25 |
51 |
26 |
19 |
34 |
| |
Write Conv |
1 |
70 |
71 |
83 |
65 |
58 |
73 |
| |
Math Skill |
1 |
54 |
55 |
71 |
46 |
52 |
45 |
| |
Math Conc |
8 |
31 |
39 |
28 |
27 |
34 |
27 |
| |
Math Prob |
-1 |
29 |
28 |
36 |
28 |
26 |
26 |
| |
NET |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Student success to be measured by:
Attendance by exception (students exceeding a threshold of absenteeism);
|
HIGH ABSENTEEISM (students absent >20 days) |
| |
3 |
4 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
|
99-00 |
1.3% |
1.6% |
4.7% |
5.7% |
5.7% |
15.8% |
|
00-01 |
3.7% |
3.5% |
3.4% |
4.6% |
7.5% |
13.8% |
High school dropout rate;
|
GRADUATION RATE |
|
Year |
91 |
92 |
93 |
94 |
95 |
96 |
97 |
98 |
99 |
00 |
01 |
|
Grad Rate |
90.6 |
89.2 |
96.2 |
87.5 |
89.2 |
91.2 |
89.8 |
88.5 |
84.5 |
84.5 |
81.13 |
Student grade failure in grades 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, and 9. (Grades 3 and 4 because of the instructional transition in those grades, and 6, 7, 8, and 9 because they surround building transitions.)
|
GRADE FAILURES |
(percent of grades that are F's) |
| |
3 |
4 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
|
99-00 |
2.1% |
1.8% |
3.3% |
5.6% |
4.8% |
9.9% |
|
00-01 |
1.8% |
1.6% |
4.7% |
4.8% |
5.1% |
16.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Students taking challenging courses in their high school program (e.g. Algebra 2, honors, AP).
|
RIGOROUS PROGRAM (graduates completing Algebra II) |
| |
Grads |
Algebra II |
% |
|
99-00 |
124 |
84 |
68% |
|
00-01 |
134 |
90 |
67% |
Standards for parent communication will be measured by:
Progress against our current baseline as measured by SALT surveys.
(Not yet available for 2001 SALT Surveys)
|
Question |
Percent says school does well |
Elementary Level |
97-98 |
98-99 |
99-00 |
01-02 |
|
Explains how to check my child's homework |
30 |
37 |
38 |
39 |
|
Tells me what skills my child needs to learn |
43 |
44 |
51 |
57 |
Middle Level |
97-98 |
98-99 |
99-00 |
01-02 |
|
Explains how to check my child's homework |
32 |
40 |
39 |
34 |
|
Tells me what skills my child needs to learn |
32 |
29 |
33 |
38 |
Secondary Level |
97-98 |
98-99 |
99-00 |
01-02 |
|
Explains how to check my child's homework |
10 |
29 |
20 |
27 |
|
Tells me what skills my child needs to learn |
20 |
29 |
28 |
28 |